The Madiga matter was heard for not more than two minutes on August 10th. The wider lack of clarity from the SC on the purpose of reservations obscures the way forward for communities like the Madiga’s, who approach the Court seeking better representation. However, the Court has displayed hesitation in providing a definitive answer to the sub-classification issue. This would allow States to provide benefits to specific communities or castes over others based on their relative ‘backwardness’. In this case, the Court will decide whether to allow further ‘sub-classifications’ within reservations. To explain his hesitation, he pointed towards the pending 7-Judge Bench in State of Punjab v Davindar Singh. Rohatgi stated that the Madiga community forms a large portion of the SC population in Andhra Pradesh, but does not receive a fair proportion of the reservations provided to SC communities.ĬJI Ramana, however, was unwilling to pass any Interim Orders. Representing the ‘ Madiga Reservation Porata Samithi’, Mr. Ramana, and Justices Hima Kohli and Krishna Murari. ![]() Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared before a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India N.V. On August 10th, 2022, the issue of sub-classification within Scheduled Caste (SC) reservations resurfaced at the Supreme Court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |